1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Dodge Colt (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Dodge Colt weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Dodge Colt (192 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1988 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Colt | ZR |
Year Released | 1988 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2510 mm |