1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 283 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2004 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Dodge | Honda |
Model | Colt | CR-V |
Year Released | 1988 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |