1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,327 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (330 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Colt | C70 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 2327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2800 mm |