1988 Dodge Lancer vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 228 kg more than 1988 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Dodge Lancer | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Lancer | CLK |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 367 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1428 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |
