1988 Fiat Regata vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Fiat Regata. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Fiat Regata would be higher. At 1,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Fiat Regata is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1988 Fiat Regata. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1988 Fiat Regata. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Fiat Regata weights approximately 176 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Fiat Regata, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 102 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Fiat Regata | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Regata | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1301 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1810 mm |