1988 Fiat Tipo vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Fiat Tipo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Fiat Tipo would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1988 Fiat Tipo. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1988 Fiat Tipo.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Fiat Tipo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Fiat Tipo. (109 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Fiat Tipo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Fiat Tipo | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Fiat | Citroen |
Model | Tipo | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |