1988 Ford Fairlane vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 1995 Rover 400 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Fairlane (138 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 1988 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Fairlane (304 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Fairlane | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Fairlane | 400 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4089 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2560 mm |