1988 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Fairlane (138 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 74 kg more than 1988 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1988 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Fairlane (304 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1988 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Fairlane | Scenic |
Year Released | 1988 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4089 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2750 mm |