1988 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1988 Ford Fairlane. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Fairlane. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1988 Ford Fairlane has manual transmission. 1988 Ford Fairlane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Fairlane | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fairlane | XF |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4089 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2908 mm |