1988 Ford Meteor vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1988 Ford Meteor is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1988 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Meteor.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Meteor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover 2000 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Meteor.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Meteor | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Meteor | 2000 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |