1988 Ford Orion vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Orion would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Orion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Orion weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Orion | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Orion | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1988 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |