1988 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1988 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Ranger | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | Ranger | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
