1988 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Pontiac Solstice
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Solstice (240 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1988 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Ranger.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Pontiac Solstice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Ranger | 2002 Pontiac Solstice | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | Solstice |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
