1988 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1988 Ford Ranger. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Ranger.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Ranger | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | UTE |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |