1988 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1988 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Ranger.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Ranger | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Ranger | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
