1988 Ford RS 200 vs. 1976 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1988 Ford RS 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1976 Nissan 240 C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford RS 200 | 1976 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | RS 200 | 240 C |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
