1988 Ford RS 200 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,804 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 836 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford RS 200 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | RS 200 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2320 mm |
