1988 Ford RS 200 vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,804 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1988 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford RS 200 | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | RS 200 | 1400 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 224 km/hour | 141 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 45 L |