1988 Ford RS 200 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 1988 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford RS 200 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | RS 200 | A6 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 75 L |