1988 Ford RS 200 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 1988 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford RS 200 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | RS 200 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 65 L |