1988 Ford Telstar vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1988 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 440 kg more than 1988 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Telstar | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Telstar | Sigma |
Year Released | 1988 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2730 mm |