1988 Ford Telstar vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Telstar would be higher. Both 1988 Ford Telstar and 2012 Nissan X-Trail are equipped with a 1,997 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1988 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Telstar.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Ford Telstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Telstar | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Telstar | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2640 mm |