1988 Ford Tempo vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1988 Ford Tempo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Tempo weights approximately 270 kg more than 1950 Simca 8.
Because 1950 Simca 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Simca 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Tempo | 8 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2430 mm |