1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Mazda 323 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Tempo (96 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 323 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Tempo (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 323 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2850 mm |