1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Pininfarina Rossa
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,472 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (485 HP) has 388 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Because 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pininfarina Rossa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (570 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Pininfarina Rossa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2000 Pininfarina Rossa | |
Make | Ford | Pininfarina |
Model | Tempo | Rossa |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 5472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 485 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 570 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.6 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |