1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2001 Mazda B4000

To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Mazda B4000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda B4000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda B4000 (324 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: