1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 195 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | CU-X |
Year Released | 1988 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |