1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Infiniti M
To start off, 2003 Infiniti M is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,494 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Infiniti M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Infiniti M (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Infiniti M should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Infiniti M weights approximately 597 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Infiniti M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Infiniti M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Infiniti M (451 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Infiniti M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2003 Infiniti M | |
Make | Ford | Infiniti |
Model | Tempo | M |
Year Released | 1988 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 4494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 451 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2810 mm |