1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 808 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Tempo | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Tempo | Shuma II |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1593 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1958 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2910 mm |
