1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Rover 25 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 25 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Tempo (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 25. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2005 Rover 25 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 25 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |