1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Tempo weights approximately 40 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (128 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1988 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Tempo | RunX |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1110 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |