1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Kia Sedona (245 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Kia Sedona weights approximately 895 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Kia Sedona (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2006 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Sedona |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3030 mm |