1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2008 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | B2300 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2840 mm |