1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Tempo weights approximately 150 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Tempo (176 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1988 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 6 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |