1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Tempo | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tempo | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
