1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Ford Tempo | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Ford | Fisker |
| Model | Tempo | Karma |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3160 mm |
