1988 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Tempo. (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Ford Tempo | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Megane |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |