1988 Holden Barina vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Holden Barina would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1988 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1988 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Holden Barina. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Holden Barina | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Barina | Matrix |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2601 mm |