1988 Holden Commodore vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1988 Holden Commodore is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Holden Commodore (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Holden Commodore weights approximately 878 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Holden Commodore | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Commodore | Seven |
Year Released | 1988 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2240 mm |