1988 Lada 2105 vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 1988 Lada 2105 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1988 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 1988 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 150 kg more than 1988 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Lada 2105 | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
| Make | Lada | Lancia |
| Model | 2105 | Flavia |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
