1988 Lada 2105 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1988 Lada 2105. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1988 Lada 2105.
Because 1988 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Lada 2105 (110 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1988 Lada 2105 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Lada 2105 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | 2105 | Micra |
Year Released | 1988 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |