1988 Lada 2105 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Lada 2105 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1629 kg more than 1988 Lada 2105.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Lada 2105. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Lada 2105. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 1988 Lada 2105 has manual transmission. 1988 Lada 2105 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Lada 2105 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Lada | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 2105 | Phantom |
Year Released | 1988 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.5 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |