1988 Lada Niva vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1988 Lada Niva is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1988 Lada Niva. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1988 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Lada Niva weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Lada Niva. (114 Nm @ 2070 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Lada Niva | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lada | Triumph |
Model | Niva | 2000 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2070 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |