1988 Lada Samara vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 1988 Lada Samara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1988 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1988 Lada Samara.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Lada Samara | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Lada | Volvo |
Model | Samara | 164 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3350 mm |