1988 Lada Samara vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X

To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1988 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1988 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 421 kg more than 1988 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Lada Samara. (98 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Lada Samara. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1988 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1988 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: