1988 Mazda 323 vs. 1963 Rover P6

To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover P6 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover P6 should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P6 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover P6 (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Rover P6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: