1988 Mazda 323 vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,616 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 365 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda Cosmo (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Mazda 323 | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 323 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1988 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |