1988 Mazda 323 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1988 Mazda 323 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 540 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Mazda 323 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 323 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1988 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |