1988 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (438 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 781 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (515 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: