1988 Mazda 626 vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1988 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1988 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Mazda 626 | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 626 | Smart |
Year Released | 1988 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2280 mm |